White House Offers Budget Freeze If Dems Don’t Agree to Deal
A budget freeze would prevent $125 billion in automatic cuts to defense and domestic programs that would otherwise be triggered by law, which both parties want to avoid
Trump administration bargainers offered a one-year budget freeze and said Democratic spending demands remained too high as talks with congressional leaders aimed at averting deep cuts in defense and domestic programs seemed no closer to resolution Wednesday.
After White House Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney took shots at House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Democrats said White House involvement in the negotiations was hindering progress and rejected the proposed freeze.
The exchange suggested the two sides were not near a handshake to avert automatic cuts and instead boost both defense and domestic programs, perhaps for two years. Without some agreement, overall spending would be slashed by $125 billion starting next year, a roughly 10% reduction in agency budgets that both parties consider too draconian.
U.S. & World
Emerging from a bargaining session in Pelosi's office that lasted over an hour, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said that without an accord, the White House was prepared to prevent the automatic cut but would force agencies to live with a far less severe, one-year extension of this year's budget.
Mnuchin said the administration would also agree to extend the federal debt limit for a year. The government is projected to deplete its legal ability to borrow money after summer, which would prompt an unprecedented failure by the government to repay its debt that could rattle the world's economy.
"The president has every intention of keeping the government open and keeping the soundness of the full faith and credit of the government," Mnuchin told reporters. He said both sides agreed not to hold the debt limit "hostage to spending."
In a joint statement after the meeting, Pelosi, D-Calif., and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., bristled at White House involvement in the negotiations. They said Democrats "are committed" to working with congressional Republicans to avert automatic spending cuts, a budget freeze and a federal default.
"If the House and Senate could work their will without interference from the President, we could come to a good agreement much more quickly," the two Democrats said.
Schumer later told reporters that "unfortunately" the White House has joined the talks. He said Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell "is just in obeisance to the White House, and so that's where we're stuck right now."
McConnell spokesman Doug Andres said, "The leader has made clear that any deal has to be bipartisan and that includes the president's signature."
Schumer also said a one-year freeze "is bad policy, it's bad politics and it's a fall back. We should be negotiating a bill."
Schumer and McConnell are also monitoring sidebar Senate talks between the chairman and top Democrat of the powerful Appropriations Committee, who have one of the few fully functional bipartisan working relationships in Washington. Those talks are more promising, congressional aides said.
Those senators, Richard Shelby, R-Ala., and Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., have a dim view of the negotiating skills of Mulvaney, a former tea party lawmaker from South Carolina who doesn't disguise his disdain for the go along, get along style of the committee.
Democrats have been pushing for increased spending for domestic programs, not a freeze, as a tradeoff for the big Pentagon increases Trump and congressional Republicans are demanding.
Mulvaney, exiting the negotiating session, said Democrats had actually increased their demand for domestic spending since the last bargaining session in May to $647 billion, which he said is $8 billion above their previous offer.
"So you tell me if things are moving in the right direction. Last time I checked, that's not how you compromise," Mulvaney said.
Democrats said Mulvaney misunderstood Pelosi's numbers. But she doesn't appear to be in a hurry and made no new spending offer Wednesday, making it clear that the Democratic House wants to first pass its spending bills at its preferred higher figure.
The first such bill passed Wednesday, a huge $1 trillion measure that amounts to an opening bid in the ongoing guns vs. butter fight with the administration.
The House voted along party lines to pass the bill, which blends the military spending that's a priority for Republicans with Democratic-sought funding increases for health and education programs.
The House-passed bill far exceeds Trump's budget request for domestic programs, attracting a White House veto threat, and denies him his full Pentagon budget increase.
It also contains policy "riders" related to abortion and other hot-button issues that drove away potential GOP supporters, though Democrats sidestepped a potentially divisive battle by preserving a longtime ban on taxpayer-financed abortion.
The bill boosts the Pentagon budget by about $16 billion over current levels, about a 2% increase, while giving health, education and labor programs an almost 7% boost. Those numbers would have to balance out more to gain Trump's signature.
Action on the measure comes as Democrats have been struggling to get their message out above the political din of Trump's Washington. The bill wraps four of the 12 annual spending measures into one, and Democrats are boasting of gains for Head Start, health research and fighting the opioid epidemic, among the myriad programs covered by the measure.